Saturday, August 03, 2013

Mainstream Media Finally Reports Some Truth About Benghazi: The Conspiracy Nuts Were Right

Well, yet another conspiracy theory is proven true. This time it didn't take the lamestream media as long to get at the truth, which it still has failed to do with respect to the Kennedy assassination, the first World Trade Center bombing, the Oklahoma City bombing, 9/11, Aurora, Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon bombing--all false flag attacks by our own government. The Telegraph and CNN report that the CIA was running an arms smuggling operation out of the diplomatic post in Benghazi where Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed following an attack on the compound, which was really used to supply arms to the Al Qaeda terrorists in Syria who are seeking to topple the legitimate government not approved by our corrupt government:
The CIA has been subjecting operatives to monthly polygraph tests in an attempt to suppress details of a US arms smuggling operation in Benghazi that was ongoing when its ambassador was killed by a mob in the city last year, according to reports.
Up to 35 CIA operatives were working in the city during the attack last September on the  US consulate that resulted in the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans, according to CNN. 
The circumstances of the attack are a subject of deep division in the US with some Congressional leaders pressing for a wide-ranging investigation into suspicions that the government has withheld details of its activities in the Libyan city.
The television network said that a CIA team was working in an annex near the consulate on a project to supply missiles from Libyan armouries to Syrian rebels.
Sources said that more Americans were hurt in the assault spearheaded by suspected Islamic radicals than had been previously reported. CIA chiefs were actively working to ensure the real nature of its operations in the city did not get out.
"Since January, some CIA operatives involved in the agency's missions in Libya, have been subjected to frequent, even monthly polygraph examinations, according to a source with deep inside knowledge of the agency's workings," CNN reported.
Frank Wolf, a US congressman who represents the district that contains CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia, is one of 150 members of Congress for a new investigation into the failures in Benghazi.
"I think it is a form of a cover-up, and I think it's an attempt to push it under the rug, and I think the American people are feeling the same way," he said. "We should have the people who were on the scene come in, testify under oath, do it publicly, and lay it out. And there really isn't any national security issue involved with regards to that."
A CIA spokesman said it had been open about its activities in Benghazi.
"The CIA has worked closely with its oversight committees to provide them with an extraordinary amount of information related to the attack on US facilities in Benghazi," a CIA statement said. "CIA employees are always free to speak to Congress if they want," the statement continued. "The CIA enabled all officers involved in Benghazi the opportunity to meet with Congress. We are not aware of any CIA employee who has experienced retaliation, including any non-routine security procedures, or who has been prevented from sharing a concern with Congress about the Benghazi incident."
So only the losses suffered by the State Department in the city had been reported to Congress.
U.S. Rep. Trey Gowdy tells Fox News' Greta Van Susteren that the Obama administration is busy creating new identities for the CIA operatives who survived the Benghazi attack in an effort to conceal them from congressional investigators. So much for Obama's claim that this was a phony scandal during last year's presidential race. It's reminiscent of former Nixon press spokesman calling Watergate a "third rate burglary."


Greg Wright said...

The difference between Nixon’s and Obama’s corruption is that the Media was anti-Nixon and currently is Obama’s propaganda tool. Further, the Democrat and Republican leadership each support Obama in their own interesting way. The two political parties have become simply two cheeks of the same ass – distinguishable in name only.

Pete Boggs said...

Well said Mr. Wright!

And that which passes through those cheeks is what they call "policy."

patriot paul said...

Glad you posted this story. Stories basically from right wing news, blogs, & social media had this correct nearly 1 year ago, even to the name of the ship carrying arms. The left wing sphere will never admit their gullibility in dismissing the issue. One such article from January:

"That Sen. Paul would use his first hearing on the Foreign Relations Committee to push this theory, despite the fact even if it were true it would fall outside of Secretary Clinton’s purview, does not say great things about his future on the body."

Another leftist blogger in January says:

"Today, the kooky conspiracy website World Net Daily published a new report, explaining that Paul believes the Obama administration may be "covering up a gun-running scheme in Benghazi that fell apart when jihadists attacked the U.S. mission there."
In an interview with WND, the senator said his "suspicion, although I don't have any proof, is that guns were being smuggled out of Libya, through Turkey and into Syria." I have a few follow-up questions for Rand Paul. First, if you "don't have any proof," what on earth are you talking about? Second, why do you keep falling for silly conspiracy theories?
Third, why is a sitting U.S. senator talking to a fringe website like World Net Daily?
For the record, as Hayes Brown explained, Paul's theory, which has apparently gotten some attention on Fox News and strange websites, is that the late Chris Stevens and the CIA secretly moved guns from Libya to Turkey, to be smuggled to Syria.
Why would the administration want to do this? I haven't the foggiest idea. Is there any evidence to suggest this is even remotely true? Apparently not.But that won't stop Rand Paul from speculating about it anyway, during televised Senate hearings and in chats with online conspiracy theorists."
To believe in these leftists' commentaries when there was so much info already in the public domain is like believing Ahmadinejad that the holocaust wasn't real.

Flogger said...

This could lead to some conflicts as some want a truth that will harm Obama in some way, and others may not want the truth to come out about our covert gun running operations. Reminds me of Iran-Contra. We were supposedly at the time just supplying humanitarian aid if recall right to Syria.

You would not think an Ambassador would be so closely linked physically to Fast and Furious with a Middle Eastern Flavor.

How this plays out will be interesting especially with all the revelations on the Government spying in the background. All the lies and deceit keep piling up. The Leadership of both parties is firmly in favor of our corrupt Police State. So we may have nothing but political hot air.