On or about August 22, 2005, Nancy M. Sigler, then wife or ex-wife of Daniel J. Sigler, Sr. purchases a home on her own at 183 N. Wildthorne Court, Columbia City, Indiana. She does not change her voter registration from the 1753 North Wilson Lake Road, Columbia City. Only her name was on the newly purchased property and only she claimed a homestead deduction on the Wildthorne Property. (See Appendix B) Source: http://beacon.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=85&LayerID=829&PageTypeID=4&PageID=564&Q=1218180865&KeyValue=92-06-04-207-031.000-004
On or about November 16, 2005, Sherie L. (Houk) Hampshire registers to vote at 8024 Sorrel Lane, Ft. Wayne, Indiana .
On or about May 2008, Nancy M. Sigler votes in the Democrat Primary allegedly using her address at 1783 North Wilson Lake Road, Columbia City (Richland North). She allegedly was never registered at her property at 183 Wildthorne, Columbia City (Columbia 7). This may explain why he told my wife’s former attorney why he could not go after her for voting in the wrong precinct in 2010 because ‘you would have to go after everyone’ but that they must go after Mr. White because of ”who he is.”
On September 12, 2008, Nancy M. Sigler sells her home at 183 Wildthorne Court to Gudakunst, Charles L & Gudakunst, Sharon S (Revocable Living Trust). Source: http://beacon.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=327&LayerID=3469&PageTypeID=4&PageID=2297&Q=795396511&KeyValue=32-07-34-510-004.000-031 Charles and Sharon Gudakunst both voted in the 2008 General Election.
On or about September 28, 2008, Daniel J. Sigler registers to vote at a rental home at 7828 Huguenard Road, Fort Wayne, Indiana (just a few miles away from Sherie Hampshire at 8024 Sorrel Lane in Fort Wayne). The home is owned by GPLYDY, LLC. Said LLC is owned by Gerry and Patricia Lydy.
On October 12, 2008, Nancy Sigler re-registers to vote at 6844 D Park Square Drive, Avon and votes in the November 2010 election. She cancels her registration on 11/17/09. She registers on 11/6/09 to add the letter “D” to her address. We are not sure yet which county she voted in. Under Indiana Election Law, it is not lawful for Ms. Sigler to vote across congressional and district lines. If she voted in Whitley County in November of 2008 while she resided in Hendricks County she has violated Indiana Code since there is no provision for her to fill out a VRG412 since it is out of county and congressional district. Since she re-registered to vote on or about October 12, 2008, the pollbooks in Hendricks County would not have updated them with her name.
Whether it is a person who is considering being a candidate, a candidate or a candidate going through a post election candidate challenge (Even though I do not agree, Judge Rosenberg (who is registered under “501 RRRR” which is against Indiana Code)has decreed that Burke v. Bennett does not apply to apply to me, nor the Bayh Case, nor Evuard nor the statutory challenge deadlines…how convenient) so I am not being treated as the Secretary of State or Secretary of State-Elect, but as a candidate still), my “race” is not over and I am being treated like a candidate for Secretary of State and if I lose at the Recount Commission challenge to my candidacy, then Ifeanyi “Vop” Osili II, the man who only won 4 counties out of 92 counties will be Secretary of State. With a five year statute of limitations on these matters, what public purpose does it serve to have an overlapping criminal and civil case at the same time where Sigler, Sr. gets to make extra-judicial statements as the press and politicians are demanding blood…even as some of loudest are voter-residency challenged themselves. Would it have served the public well to charge Evan Bayh with voter fraud and voter registration fraud when he voted in Vigo County in 1984 as he admitted he lived at his dad’s condo in Indianapolis when he came from D.C. while he dealt with his candidacy challenge for Governor in 1987 and 1988 in the Shelby County Courts (of course he was the Secretary of State and an attorney when he had residency and voter amnesia and it is profound how the media did not say a peep and chastised Republicans for nitpicking and trying to limit voters choices). That is why we have the below law…to keep elections and election procedures from being influenced by judges and prosecutors. This law was updated in 2005 to include threats of bodily harm to mirror a related federal law. Otherwise, no one will want to run for office and the loser will just file with the prosecutor to steal the office away from the will of the voters.
Actions to unlawfully influence voter or candidate
Sec. 18. (a) As used in this section, "candidate" includes an individual whom the person knows is considering becoming a candidate.
(b) A person who, for the purpose of influencing a voter or candidate, does any of the following commits a Class D felony:
(1) Seeks to enforce the payment of a debt by force or threat of force.
(2) Ejects or threatens to eject the voter or candidate from a house the voter or candidate occupies.
(3) Begins a criminal prosecution.
(4) Damages the business or trade of the voter or candidate.
(5) Communicates a threat to commit a forcible felony (as defined in IC 35-41-1-11) against a voter or candidate with the intent that the voter or candidate:
(A) engage in conduct against the voter's or candidate's will; or
(B) be placed in fear of retaliation for a prior lawful act as a voter or candidate.
As added by P.L.5-1986, SEC.10. Amended by P.L.176-1999, SEC.118; P.L.103-2005, SEC.36.
While you may not feel that any of this rises to the level of alleged violations you are used to dealing with, Mr. Sigler, Sr. and his counterparts have done everything they can to humiliate and break my family over the exact same issues. Mr. Sigler, Sr. is not the law, he is not a god and he is not above the law. If he and his adult child Daniel Sigler, Jr. (whom my mother has filed a disciplinary complaint against for his childish and outlandish behavior while his spittle from his mouth hit her in the face. Nice touch D.J. Hazing grandma) wish to have clean hands then Sigler, Sr. needs to come clean about his voting and residency. Since my former wife is now involved, it is only fair that Sigler, Sr. answer questions about his ex-wife Nancy M. Sigler’s voting in potentially the wrong precinct, county and congressional district.
Thank you for your consideration. All I want is for me and Mr. Sigler, Sr., Sherie Hamshire and Nancy M. Sigler and DJ Sigler, Jr. to be treated the same under the law as me and my family.
Charles P. White