Sunday, September 13, 2009

New Hampshire Secretary Of State To Investigate Obama For Election Fraud

New Hampshire Secretary of State William Gardner, a non-partisan appointee, has agreed to investigate allegations that Democrats and Barack Hussein Obama misrepresented his natural born status in order to gain placement on the New Hampshire ballot as a presidential candidate. Gardner agreed to the investigation after a request made by State Rep. Lawrence Rappaport on Thursday. According to a report by The Post & Email, the issue has arisen over the discovery that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi signed two different certifications of Obama's nomination as the Democratic candidate, one certification stating he was a natural born citizen and constitutionally eligible to serve as president a second one omitting the constitutional qualification language. The latter certification was sent to state election officials according to the Canada Free Press. The Post & Email's John Charlton writes:

New Hampshire State Representative, Lawrence M. Rappaport payed a visit to Mr. William Gardner, the NH Secretary of State, on Thursday, Sept. 10th.

His stunning request: an investigation of Barack Hussein Obama’s presence on the NH 2008 Ballot.

Gardner’s stunning response: an investigation will commence.

I interviewed Mr. Rappaport by email, and asked him, on what basis did he make his complaint; he responded, “The basis for all of this is possible fraud. I don’t know what penalties will be assessed if fraud is proven.”

Rappaport’s action follows stunning revelations that Nancy Pelosi deliberately signed two different forms certifying Barack Hussein Obama was the Democratic National Party candidate for the presidency. While these forms have been known to exist for some time, it was J.B. Williams, writing for the Canadian Free Press who brought them national notoriety, earlier this week.

It is unclear, if, in the eventuality that New Hampshire determines fraud was committed, on the grounds that Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States, if the State will move, through its governor, to take some sort of action on the National scene, or who would be liable in law for the crime committed in-state.
This is the discovery that the Canada Free Press' JB Williams reported on last week that has created this new dust up over Obama's natural born status:

Aware of the fact that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II – Section I constitutional requirements for the office of President, what well-seasoned professional politician would be stupid enough to sign their name and stake their personal career upon certifying Obama as eligible?

Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates are nominated at their respective Party Conventions.

Believe it or not, each Party is assigned the duty of vetting and certifying the legal eligibility of their own candidates. I know, like asking the fox to guard the henhouse, right. But hey, we are talking about a country which still thinks there is a separation of powers between the High Court and the Executive branch, which seats that court by way of political appointment, confirmed by congress, which wants a piece of the judge and expects a few political favors too . . .

The document is signed by Chair of the DNC Convention and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond and Colorado Notary of Public Shalifa A. Williamson. It is dated August 28, 2008.

However, this document [with the constitutional eligibility certification] was never delivered to a single state DNC Office for state certification, and it was therefore, never presented to any state Election Commission as certification of these candidates, although I do have a copy of this notarized document myself.

Instead, a very similar document was delivered to fifty state DNC offices, which those offices certified to each of fifty state Election Commissions, who then date-stamped the document and stuck it in a file cabinet, and proceeded to place these “certified” candidates on the ballot.
Blogger and New Jersey attorney Leo Donofrio brought a lawsuit prior to last year's presidential election against that state's Secretary of State for failing to ascertain presidential candidates' natural born status before placing them on the ballot. Donofrio's case was dismissed for lack of standing. He appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court but was denied cert. Donofrio has his own thoughts on the New Hampshire Secretary of State's announcement here. It begs the question why Gardner didn't do his job last year.

UPDATE: I've received a copy of the certification the DNC filed with the Indiana Election Division. It is identical to the second document linked to above in the first paragraph which does not include a certification that Obama meets the constitutional eligibility requirement. You can view it by clicking here. Indiana law clearly provides that a candidate for president and vice president must meet the constitutional requirement. I.C. 3-8-1-6 reads: "A candidate for the office of President or Vice President of the United States must have the qualifications provided in Article 2, Section 1, clause 4 of the Constitution of the United States." The certification statute, however, does not include this requirement. I.C. 3-10-4-5 (a) reads: "The state chairman of each political party shall certify to the election division the names of the nominees of the party for President and Vice President of the United States and the state of which nominee is a resident." By omitting the requirement in the certification statute, Indiana law fails to ensure compliance with the constitutional eligibility requirement it mandates under I.C. 3-8-1-6.

7 comments:

jbjd said...

Canada Free Press is the front for Douglas Hagmann, Founder of Northeast Intelligence Network, or “NEIN,” for “no” in German. “CFP” intentionally stole work produced on my blog, without accreditation, and are reaping the notoriety for this usurpation. My ire vests not in this theft of intellectual property but rather, in the knowledge that this unscrupulous group will unjustly benefit from the caliber of the work, my work. And people will tend to credit other tripe that comes out of this group, assuming it has any intrinsic value whatsoever, which it does not.

Way back in December 2008, Justin Riggs was contacting state elections officials all over the country to obtain Certifications of Nominations. HI sent back both the DNC and RNC Certifications, which he posted, along with the cover letter from elections officials. A blogger who has helped me on several projects, including distributing the memorandum I wrote trying to resolve the issue of standing confronted by Plaintiffs in federal court, by proposing military Plaintiffs who could survive a Motion to Dismiss; thought I might be interested in Justin’s work and emailed the link. Already familiar with the SC Certification, as soon as I saw the HI Certification, I noticed the extra line regarding BO’s Constitutional qualification. Then, I looked at the cover letter from HI elections officials; this contained a cite to Hawaiian Revised Statutes. I checked with Justin; no, he hadn’t cited this law to obtain the Certifications. So, I looked up the law. And sure enough, this was the requirement that party officials must Certify the candidate for POTUS is Constitutionally eligible for the job. (I also noticed there was no “Received” stamp on the Certification from HI, as well as the signature anomaly. But none of these details was material to creating any cause of action that could halt the Congressional ratification of the EC vote; or, after such ratification, that could prompt Congress to initiate Impeachment proceedings.)

You will find these documents posted and/or referenced throughout my blog, beginning last December, and recently highlighted in an article I posted on August 13, “IF DROWNING OUT OPPOSING FACTS IS un-AMERICAN THEN, IGNORING UNPLEASANT FACTS IS un-AMERICAN, TOO.” The distinction is again pointed out in the just published “MODEL COMPLAINT OF ELECTION FRAUD TO STATE A’sG.” Notice, CFP did not reveal the provenance of information they just ‘published’ about the Certifications, or provide an explanation as to why it took them so long to ‘find’ this information and realize its significance.

WND copied my work wholesale, and credited Mr. Williams from CFP but not me. Having read my work, you know they fabricated the nuances, for example, they omitted the fact that, HI law required the extra line in the Certification. Well, from now on, I trust you will assume that, WND is stealing other people’s hard work, too. But this would only make sense. Because in the same way that CFP is the front for Douglas Hagmann; Center for Western Journalism is the front for WND and Farah. They can label their propaganda however they want; but essentially, they are in the business of shaping opinions and not investigating and reporting hard ‘news.’


http://jbjd.wordpress.com

jbjd said...

Canada Free Press is a front for Douglas Hagmann, Founder of Northeast Intelligence Network, or “NEIN,” for “no” in German. CFP stole work produced on my blog and are reaping the notoriety for this usurpation. My ire vests not in the theft of my intellectual property but in knowing that this unscrupulous group will unjustly benefit from the caliber of my work. People will credit other tripe that comes out of this group, assuming it has intrinsic value, which it does not.

In December 2008, Justin Riggs was contacting state elections officials all over the country to obtain Certifications of Nominations. HI sent back both the DNC and RNC Certifications, which he posted, along with the cover letter from elections officials. A blogger who has helped me on several projects, including distributing the memorandum I wrote to resolve the issue of standing confronted by Plaintiffs in federal court, by proposing certain military Plaintiffs could survive a Motion to Dismiss; thought I might be interested in Justin’s work and emailed the link. Already familiar with the SC Certification, when I saw the HI Certification, I noticed the extra line regarding BO’s Constitutional qualification. Then, I looked at the cover letter from HI elections officials; this contained a cite to Hawaiian Revised Statutes. I checked with Justin; no, he hadn’t cited this law to obtain the Certifications. So, I looked up the law. Sure enough, this was the requirement that party officials must Certify the candidate for POTUS is Constitutionally eligible for the job. (I also noticed there was no “Received” stamp on the Certification from HI, and the signature anomaly. But none of these details was material to creating a cause of action that could halt Congressional ratification of the EC vote; or, after such ratification, that could prompt Congress to initiate Impeachment proceedings.)

You will find these documents posted and/or referenced throughout my blog, beginning last December, and recently highlighted in an article I posted on August 13, “IF DROWNING OUT OPPOSING FACTS IS un-AMERICAN THEN, IGNORING UNPLEASANT FACTS IS un-AMERICAN, TOO.” The distinction is again pointed out in the just published “MODEL COMPLAINT OF ELECTION FRAUD TO STATE A’sG.” Notice, CFP did not reveal the provenance of information they just ‘published’ about the Certifications, or provide an explanation as to why it took them so long to ‘find’ this information and realize its significance. (to be continued...)

jbjd said...

(...2 of 2)
WND copied my work wholesale, and credited Mr. Williams from CFP but not me. They fabricated the nuances, for example, they omitted the fact, HI law required the extra line in the Certification. From now on, assume that, WND is stealing other people’s hard work, too. This makes sense, since in the same way that CFP is the front for Douglas Hagmann; Center for Western Journalism is the front for WND and Farah. They can label their propaganda however they want; but essentially, they are in the business of shaping opinions and not investigating and analyzing hard ‘news.’

The problem with stealing my information for their own use is this. A state Rep. in NH saw their work and contacted the SoS in NH to look into fraud. Now, as I have been saying since last summer, no provision of any law, federal or state, requires any state official to check whether the nominee for POTUS from the major political party is Constitutionally eligible for the job. This is the reason that any lawsuit predicated on Mandamus was doomed to fail. That is, the court - judicial branch - will not order the SoS - executive branch - to perform a specific job function unless such function is spelled out in the law - legislative branch. Most state laws also fail to require the nominee to be Constitutionally eligible for the job. In fact, most laws entitle the name of the nominee to appear on the ballot. All the party is required to do is to Certify the name of its nominee, to appropriate state officials. So, unless a NH law requires the nominee to be a NBC, no fraud occurred. Let's say, the SoS of NH reports, no fraud occurred. A’sG in other states will hear this and figure, no fraud occurred. So, what are these people filing these 4-page complaints of election fraud talking about?

Does this mean, the D's did not commit election fraud in states other than NH? Absolutely not. But, tragically, because of the malfeasance of people associated with CFP and WND, only readers of my blog will 'get' that distinction.
http://jbjd.wordpress.com

Advance Indiana said...

jbjc, Thanks for sharing. It looks like your research reveals the need for legislation such as that before Congress which would require proof of a candidate's constitutional eligibility for the office as a condition to being a candidate. The mainstream media has dismissed those members of Congress who back such legislation as whacko birthers.

Advance Indiana said...

jbjd, I would also say welcome to the world of blogging. Mainstream reporters use information first reported on by blogs all the time without attributing their work. I don't understand why they would send two different certifications. There's certainly no harm in including the constitutional eligbility certification for all states regardless of whether the actual state law requires it.

HOOSIERS FOR FAIR TAX said...

jbjd...I'm adding your blog to the ones I read. Thanks for your work.

swan said...

Yes, why has did not Sec of St Gardner investigate the reportedly documentation Pelosi filed with New Hampshire, before the presidential election, and why did it take a state senator in New Hampshire to call this "irregularity" to him. Thank you, Honorable Rappaport.

I have not read about this anywhere else, and am, again, sure grateful to Advance Indiana. How much harmful incompetence, and worse, of elected officials, or worse, goes unreported.