Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Former GOP Senator Calls For End To "Don't Ask, Don't"

Former Wyoming Sen. Alan Simpson (R) speaks out against the current "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy he supported as a U.S. senator in the Washington Post today. Simpson is particularly critical of the military's Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff recent statement calling homosexuality "immoral." Simpson explains why he thinks it's time to end DADT:

As a lifelong Republican who served in the Army in Germany, I believe it is critical that we review -- and overturn -- the ban on gay service in the military. I voted for "don't ask, don't tell." But much has changed since 1993.

My thinking shifted when I read that the military was firing translators because they are gay. According to the Government Accountability Office, more than 300 language experts have been fired under "don't ask, don't tell," including more than 50 who are fluent in Arabic. This when even Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice recently acknowledged the nation's "foreign language deficit" and how much our government needs Farsi and Arabic speakers. Is there a "straight" way to translate Arabic? Is there a "gay" Farsi? My God, we'd better start talking sense before it is too late. We need every able-bodied, smart patriot to help us win this war.

In today's perilous global security situation, the real question is whether allowing homosexuals to serve openly would enhance or degrade our readiness. The best way to answer this is to reconsider the original points of opposition to open service.

First, America's views on homosexuals serving openly in the military have changed dramatically. The percentage of Americans in favor has grown from 57 percent in 1993 to a whopping 91 percent of 18- to 29-year-olds surveyed in a Gallup poll in 2003.

Military attitudes have also shifted. Fully three-quarters of 500 vets returning from Iraq and Afghanistan said in a December Zogby poll that they were comfortable interacting with gay people. Also last year, a Zogby poll showed that a majority of service members who knew a gay member in their unit said the person's presence had no negative impact on the unit or personal morale. Senior leaders such as retired Gen. John Shalikashvili and Lt. Gen. Daniel Christman, a former West Point superintendent, are calling for a second look.

Second, 24 nations, including 12 in Operation Enduring Freedom and nine in Operation Iraqi Freedom, permit open service. Despite controversy surrounding the policy change, it has had no negative impact on morale, cohesion, readiness or recruitment. Our allies did not display such acceptance back when we voted on "don't ask, don't tell," but we should consider their common-sense example.

Third, there are not enough troops to perform the required mission. The Army is "about broken," in the words of Colin Powell. The Army's chief of staff, Gen. Peter Schoomaker, told the House Armed Services Committee in December that "the active-duty Army of 507,000 will break unless the force is expanded by 7,000 more soldiers a year." To fill its needs, the Army is granting a record number of "moral waivers," allowing even felons to enlist. Yet we turn away patriotic gay and lesbian citizens.

Simpson makes a very salient point in his column when he brings up the fact that the Nazis' communications code during World War II was cracked by a gay man. Simpson writes, "In World War II, a British mathematician named Alan Turing led the effort to crack the Nazis' communication code." "He mastered the complex German enciphering machine, helping to save the world, and his work laid the basis for modern computer science." "Does it matter that Turing was gay?" Simpson then takes Gen. Peter Pace to task for calling homosexuality "immoral." He writes:

This week, Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, said that homosexuality is "immoral" and that the ban on open service should therefore not be changed." "Would Pace call Turing immoral?"

Since 1993, I have had the rich satisfaction of knowing and working with many openly gay and lesbian Americans, and I have come to realize that "gay" is an artificial category when it comes to measuring a man or woman's on-the-job performance or commitment to shared goals. It says little about the person. Our differences and prejudices pale next to our historic challenge. Gen. Pace is entitled, like anyone, to his personal opinion, even if it is completely out of the mainstream of American thinking. But he should know better than to assert this opinion as the basis for policy of a military that represents and serves an entire nation. Let us end "don't ask, don't tell." This policy has become a serious detriment to the readiness of America's forces as they attempt to accomplish what is arguably the most challenging mission in our long and cherished history.


Anonymous said...

Just thought you would want to know that Laura McPhee wrote something in Nuvo today that credits both you and Bil Browning for the Eric Miller stuff.

Anonymous said...

Wow. Alan Simpson is no raving left-wing lunatric.

But Alan, Honey, it's not the Government Assountability Office. It's the General Accounting Office.

Small point, but he wa sin DC for almost three decades.

He sure didn't mix any words about the good general did he?

Anonymous said...


stAllio! said...

the mcphee letter 1:01 refers to is here.

Wilson46201 said...

It's always so refreshing to find an occasional Republican like Simpson who says the right thing about an LGBT issue ... kinda like horned owls, snail darters, polar bears and other endangered species.