Kerwin Olson, executive director of the Citizen Action Coalition, said the settlement came as a shock to him. He said the power plant should never have been approved.
"The settlement on the surface appears to give Duke Energy far too much. The terms appear to be completely unacceptable to CAC," he said.
Duke Energy Indiana President Doug Esamann says the agreement meets two objectives, reducing what Indiana customers will pay in rates and resolving uncertainty for Duke Energy shareholders.
"We're now in the home stretch of completing a facility that will modernize our electric system and provide Indiana with cleaner power to meet increasingly strict federal environmental regulations," he said.The operative objective here was to resolve uncertainty for Duke's shareholders. The deal does little to alleviate the higher cost of electricity that the company is being allowed to pass on to consumers under this agreement. Nothing at all has changed at the most corrupt public utility regulator in the country. It's nothing but a glorified auction to line the pockets of the utility industry.
The comparisons between this Edwardsport project and the failed Marble Hill nuclear power plant project are too eerie. Duke's predecessor, PSI, originally told state regulators the plant would cost about $1 billion to build when it obtained approval for it in the 1970s. After the company spent $2.8 billion and construction was about 60% complete, the company abandoned the project in 1984. Under the deal state regulators struck with Duke for the Edwardsport project, construction costs paid by consumers will be capped at $2.6 billion, or about $700 million less than the anticipated $3.3 billion cost. If the past is any indication, there will be a lot more to this story before it finally ends, none of which will likely be good news for the utility's consumers.