Rush Limbaugh’s bid to buy the St. Louis Rams ran into opposition within the NFL on Tuesday. Colts owner Jim Irsay vowed to vote against him, and commissioner Roger Goodell said the conservative commentator’s “divisive” comments would not be tolerated from any NFL insider.Some of you may recall the WTHR investigative story by Roger Harvey from a few years back that uncovered Irsay's abuse of prescription drugs, not unlike Limbaugh's problem from a few years back. Irsay admitted he had a problem. He had been hospitalized for drug overdoses, and there was considerable evidence of prescription drug fraud. Because of Irsay's corporate clout in Indianapolis, the investigation was quickly dropped without consequences. Limbaugh wasn't so lucky. A partisan Florida prosecutor doggedly pursued criminal charges against Limbaugh until the case was eventually dismissed. Not even the NFL owners seemed concern about Irsay's fitness as a team owner. So it strikes me as a bit hypocritical from one pill popper to another to question Limbaugh's suitability as an NFL team owner. This is also the same NFL team owner who had no problem with the anti-gay views of his former head coach, Tony Dungy. I haven't taken any polls, but I suspect Limbaugh has more fans in the Indy area than Jim Irsay. What do you think?
“I, myself, couldn’t even consider voting for him,” Irsay said at an owners meetings. “When there are comments that have been made that are inappropriate, incendiary and insensitive … our words do damage, and it’s something that we don’t need.”
Limbaugh has long been a hero of conservatives and villain to the left, thriving on his place in the political spectrum while establishing himself as one of the most successful broadcasters in history. But the NFL tries to avoid controversy, as Limbaugh learned in 2003 when he was forced to resign from ESPN’s Sunday night football broadcast after saying of Philadelphia’s Donovan McNabb(notes): “I think what we’ve had here is a little social concern in the NFL. The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well.”
Limbaugh also said, according to transcripts posted on his Web site: “The NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it.” That comment, and others, resurfaced this month when he revealed he is teaming with St. Louis Blues owner Dave Checketts to bid on the Rams.
Goodell said the Rams updated the league on the progress of their potential sale, but bidders were not discussed.
“They’re not certain they are even sellers,” New York Giants co-owner Steve Tisch said, adding that he expected a decision by the end of the season. “We can’t speculate on potential owners because they have not brought up any names to put before ownership. It’s out there, but without confirmation from the Rams or the Rosenbloom family, frankly, we don’t know who the potential buyers are.”
Patriots owner Robert Kraft referred questions about Limbaugh to the commissioner. Texans owner Bob McNair said anyone who meets the “normal criteria” is a candidate to own a team.
“But our vetting process is very thorough,” he said.
Prominent blacks are already lining up against Limbaugh, including the Revs. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. NFL Players Association head DeMaurice Smith, who also is black, urged players to speak out against Limbaugh’s bid, and several have already said they would not play for his team.
But Irsay is the first owner who has stated unequivocally he would reject Limbaugh if it comes up for a vote. Prospective owners must be approved by 24 of the league’s 32 teams.
Irsay said at first that he would consult with people he respected, such as defensive lineman Dwight Freeney(notes), coach Jim Caldwell and former coach Tony Dungy, all of whom are black. But later, the owner said he did not need to get anyone else’s input before rejecting someone who made a habit of “demonizing individuals.”
“I met Rush only once. He seemed like a nice guy to me and all those kind of things,” Irsay said. “It’s bigger than the NFL. As a nation, and as a world, we’ve got to watch our words and our thoughts. They can do damage.”
Dedicated to the advancement of the State of Indiana by re-affirming our state's constitutional principles that: all people are created equal; no religious test shall be imposed on our public officials and offices of trust; and no special privileges or immunities shall be granted to any class of citizens which are not granted on the same terms to all citizens. Advance Indiana, LLC. Copyright 2005-16. All rights reserved.
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
From One Pill Popper To Another: Just Say No
Well, it didn't take Colts owner Jim Irsay, Indiana's biggest corporate welfare recipient, to express his opposition as an NFL team owner to conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh becoming an owner of the St. Louis Rams. The AP's Jimmy Golen explains how Irsay doesn't think Limbaugh is fit to be an NFL owner:
This is coming from a billionaire who absolutely would not budge from the revenue he rakes in from non-Colts event dates, as the city figures out how to get by without repairing sidewalks. Irsay only signed what was put before him. Limbaugh knows he lives and dies by his tongue. A pox on all their houses for their snake oil pitch to the medium markets about the jobs and prosperity from professional sports. They left out that little part about needing a new stadium every 20 years.
ReplyDeleteWay to go, Jim Irsay. I am certain he is the first to say NO to the hate monger. It seems unchristian of you to condemn Irsay for a problem of a few years ago which he admitted, received treatment and conquered.
ReplyDeleteAbout as forgiving as Jim Irsay is to Limbaugh for some off-color comments he made as an off-color commentator that were twisted and turned by his enemies for political advantage.
ReplyDeleteI think you're blog post is right on!
ReplyDeleteAnswer: in my opinion, Limbaugh has more fans in the Indy area than does Irsay.
ReplyDeleteAt least Rush earns his money by the voluntary choice of millions of Americans to buy what he's selling. Irsay pays off politicians and steals from thousands of taxpayers who cannot afford what he's selling, and now cannot afford many other things because of what Irsay receives from them by force of "law." If you don't like Rush, you can turn him off. Where's my opportunity to turn off Jim Irsay and the LOS?
ReplyDeleteIrsay is in the shadows of other infamous Dems who Carl Brizzi will not prosecute, "Sweet Pea" Monroe Gray, "Teflon" Doris Minton-McNeil, Ron Gibson...
ReplyDeleteI wish Irsay would pack up & leave.
The nice thing about Rush? He's free and I can turn him off.
ReplyDeleteThe nice thing about Ir$ay? I can't think of anything.