tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post3621831234342311803..comments2024-03-25T13:42:25.771-05:00Comments on Advance Indiana™: Hillary Clinton Haunted By Old Interview About Child Molestation CaseGary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-36485782188428091942014-06-21T17:59:46.447-05:002014-06-21T17:59:46.447-05:00This is not molestation. This is rape which cause...This is not molestation. This is rape which caused the victim to bleed. It was also child endangerment, corrupting a minor and probably kidnapping.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-48772935451336388322014-06-17T14:35:05.848-05:002014-06-17T14:35:05.848-05:00Lest we forget the reason Hillary was fired by the...Lest we forget the reason Hillary was fired by the House Judiciary Committee:<br /><br />"The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.<br /><br />Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.<br /><br />Why?<br /><br />“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”<br />This isn’t exactly news. When her lachrymose performance arguably won her New Hampshire, Zeifman tried to tell people about Hillary’s duplicity. Patterico noticed the effort, but few others picked it up. Zeifman wrote at his website:<br /><br />After hiring Hillary, Doar assigned her to confer with me regarding rules of procedure for the impeachment inquiry. At my first meeting with her I told her that Judiciary Committee Chairman Peter Rodino, House Speaker Carl Albert, Majority Leader “Tip” O’Neill, Parliamentarian Lou Deschler and I had previously all agreed that we should rely only on the then existing House Rules, and not advocate any changes. I also quoted Tip O’Neill’s statement that: “To try to change the rules now would be politically divisive. It would be like trying to change the traditional rules of baseball before a World Series.”<br /><br />Hillary assured me that she had not drafted, and would not advocate, any such rules changes. However, as documented in my personal diary, I soon learned that she had lied. She had already drafted changes, and continued to advocate them. In one written legal memorandum, she advocated denying President Nixon representation by counsel. In so doing she simply ignored the fact that in the committee’s then most recent prior impeachment proceeding, the committee had afforded the right to counsel to Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas."<br />http://nation.foxnews.com/2014/02/25/hillary-fired-lies-unethical-behavior-congressional-job-former-bossGary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-71428497627292097612014-06-17T14:31:29.423-05:002014-06-17T14:31:29.423-05:00The criticism isn't directed at her defense of...The criticism isn't directed at her defense of her client if you bothered to read it. She breached her client's confidences. And if she knew he was guilty, then why would she file court arguments claiming the girl fabricated the story and sought the attention of older men given the legal argument she had on the botched gathering of forensic evidence? Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-8861916449349451622014-06-17T13:06:07.431-05:002014-06-17T13:06:07.431-05:00The duty of an attorney is to represent their clie...The duty of an attorney is to represent their client. She had an ethical obligation to give her client the best representation possible. And she did. <br /><br />Even those accused of the most heinous of crimes deserve competent legal representation, and the historical record demonstrates this by future President John Adams as he defended the soldiers who committed the Boston Massacre. <br /><br />Nice try, but this isn't a story at all, it's just a distraction by those who oppose the Clintons. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-35020051573062085562014-06-17T09:22:31.054-05:002014-06-17T09:22:31.054-05:00Hillary Clinton exposed, again! And yet, she is t...Hillary Clinton exposed, again! And yet, she is the frontrunner for the Democratic Party nomination for President, and recent polls indicate that she will easily win.<br /><br /><br />Marycatherine Bartonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14674049191412285346noreply@blogger.com