tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post433277893756437263..comments2024-03-25T13:42:25.771-05:00Comments on Advance Indianaâ„¢: Unbelievable: Indiana Legislative Leaders To Continue Fight Against Gay MarriageGary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-73924110877247574202013-06-30T12:05:31.691-05:002013-06-30T12:05:31.691-05:00Gay marriage need to be opposed vigorously, becaus...Gay marriage need to be opposed vigorously, because it's not about "marriage," but about greater than full legitimacy, acceptance, indoctrination. <br /><br />Once they have equal status, they'll claim historic discrimination and demand better than equal status to remedy prior wrongs. Schools will have homosexual education, and textbooks will be required to present homosexual couples with regular frequency. Media, advertising, television, etc. will have to depict homosexual couples and relationship in proportion (or far greater) to their population.<br /><br />They'll work their way around to imposing homosexual compliance certifications, akin to "No animals were harmed in the making of this film..." The EEOC component of job applications will contain a "homosexual" identifier, standing equally alongside other minorities.<br /><br />Given that many of them hail from the sophist class, they're well adept at using the legislature of liars: the courts, to enact their social agenda.<br /><br />So many of them are social termites, and we need to keep that frontier well in the distance. Full support to Pence or anyone else that continues to make a stand to protect this country from their agenda.Catohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03341628086158209539noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-36665984347413564732013-06-27T09:12:21.217-05:002013-06-27T09:12:21.217-05:00Then what impact will a marriage amendment to indi...Then what impact will a marriage amendment to indiana's constitution have with the death of doma?dphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10527147399447467001noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-86995325907738611032013-06-26T20:35:27.538-05:002013-06-26T20:35:27.538-05:00I just have to wonder how Legal Civil Unions in In...I just have to wonder how Legal Civil Unions in Indiana would take bread out of the mouths of Brian Bosma and Senate President Pro Tem David Long??? <br /><br />Floggerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10383015097067413086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-78712110445812635222013-06-26T20:26:41.396-05:002013-06-26T20:26:41.396-05:00It's Gary.
That's the Court's direct ...It's Gary.<br /><br />That's the Court's direct holding in this case, but if you read the language contained in the decision, it is inconceivable the majority would conclude any differently on the broader questions. Justice Scalia's dissent laments that the decision sets up the day in the near future for the other shoe to drop in that respect. <br /><br />My point is that you cannot avoid equal protection problems if you say that citizens in one state get benefits under federal law that citizens in other states don't get because of how the state law interprets marriage--a definition this majority holds cannot withstand 5th Amendment scrutiny. Why would anyone believe this majority would uphold a state law that would deny benefits under federal law in the same manner as the federal DOMA it struck down today does? Justice Scalia tells us what that answer will be--the other shoe will drop.Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-62740823194303548702013-06-26T20:04:58.847-05:002013-06-26T20:04:58.847-05:00"Now that same-sex married couples in Indiana..."<i>Now that same-sex married couples in Indiana will enjoy the same rights under federal law as all opposite-sex couples presently enjoy, any continued move by Indiana lawmakers to throw up roadblocks to rights afforded under state law to same-sex couples are totally misdirected and self-defeating.</i>"<br /><br />Mike, I'm confused by that statement. Today's decision by the Supreme Court only provides federal benefits to married same-sex couples in states who legally recognize same-sex marriage. Indiana does not.dphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10527147399447467001noreply@blogger.com