At least one member of the U.S. Senate appears to be capable of exercising common sense and not simply go about conducting his oversight role of the federal government with eyes wide shut as virtually all other members of Congress now do. A recently-revealed letter Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) sent to FBI Director James B. Comey, Jr. reveals his frustration with the FBI's stonewalling of questions he asked about the Boston Marathon bombing months ago that were never answered, an event readers of this blog have been duly informed was a complete false flag attack carried out by rogue forces within our own government. Nothing adds up and the more Grassley learns, the more he becomes convinced that the government is lying to the public and Congress about its role in the attack.
Grassley's skepticism is found near the beginning of his letter to Comey when he reminds him that 14 of the 19 planned terrorist attacks since 9/11 "involved FBI sting operations using undercover agents and informers who pose as terrorists." Grassley still is seeking answers about whether Tamerlan Tsarnaev was used by the FBI as a tactic of recruitment or sting operation and what other conversations the FBI may have had with the Tsarnaev brothers prior to the bombing other than the interviews the agency only acknowledged conducting of the brothers after the Russians revealed they had warned U.S. intelligence agencies about the brothers. As readers of this blog have been informed, the Tsarnaev brothers' uncle, Ruslan Tsarni, has a past association with the CIA and was once married to the daughter of one of the intelligence agency's top operatives, Graham Fuller.
As anyone with a brain could figure out, it is inconceivable that the FBI didn't know who the Tsarnaev brothers were when they released to the public images of them near the scene of the bombings and identified them as suspects. Grassley wants to know when the images of the brothers were first identified, what agency made that identification, what investigative steps the FBI undertook before releasing their images to the public and whether the suspects were under surveillance by the agency prior to the release of the photos.
The FBI would have the public believe that the two suspects, upon learning they had been identified as the suspects, shot and killed an MIT police officer sitting in his car for no apparent reason, carjacked a vehicle driven by a Chinese man, engaged in a high speed chase with police for the local mass transit agency after the carjacking victim fled the car and called police, followed by a shootout with police that left another police officer seriously wounded from friendly fire and the elder brother shot dead and run over by the younger brother's fleeing vehicle. The FBI, according to this meme, was just sitting back and watching it all play out from the sidelines.
Grassley's investigators learned information that really troubled Cambridge Police. Prior to MIT Officer Sean Collier being shot and killed in his car, Cambridge police officers encountered "multiple teams of FBI employees conducting surveillance in the area of Central Square in Cambridge." Despite the agency's participation in the Joint Terrorism Task Force, nobody within the police department had been made aware of the FBI's surveillance activities. Grassley wants to know if the FBI was conducting surveillance of the Tsarnaev brothers when these wild events supposedly played out on the night in question.
A flack in the local FBI office told a local Fox affiliate in Boston that the agents seen by local police in Central Square were conducting a separate investigation of MIT students the agency supposedly thought might be linked to the bombing. The local FBI office is also sticking by its story that it did not know the identity of the brothers until after the shootout in Watertown where Tamerlan's body was supposedly recovered--the same location where amateur video footage captured images of Tamerlan stripped naked and being taken into custody by police alive and unharmed. Indiana's Sen. Dan Coats, who sits on the Intelligence Committee, has expressed no interest in learning what truly happened in Boston.
Good for Grassley...Pictures are worth 9/11 words....prior to, during and after of events. That is -- the one's uncovering the real story and truth...hope it comes out in main media...sigh...and the one's doing so aren't blown up in their car, die of heart attacks or mysteriously disappear. Many Americans seek alternative media and do so openly are probably targeted when they uncover the truth too or seek the truth...
ReplyDeleteThe there is the case of Ibragim Todashev a friend of Tamerlan Tsarnaev, killed while being questioned in Florida on May 22nd. Oddly, I think, the questioning was in Todashev's apartment for from what I read 8 hours.
ReplyDeletePer Wiki:
On July 16, the release of Todashev's autopsy report, completed by a Florida medical examiner's office, was blocked by the FBI because the "case was still under active investigation."
Going back to the early 1960's we have Operations Northwoods. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
The idea of Northwoods was to provide a pretext for an assault on Cuba. The plan itself was directed against Cuba, but actions proposed provide a Blue Print for other future activities.
The actual documents for the plan were declassified and are a chilling read. Just as an example:
"We could sink a boatload of Cubans en route to Florida (real or simulated). We could foster attempts on lives of Cuban refugees in the United States even to the extent of wounding in instances to be widely publicized. Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement, also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government."
Todashev was executed by the FBI, which then claimed he had given a confession about he and Tamerlan's role in an unsolved Boston drug murder, which could have just as easily been committed by Aaron Fernandez fow all we know. 9/11 was based on Operation Northwoods. President Kennedy was appalled when the Joint Chiefs of Staff endorsed it and brought it to him for approval at Alan Dulles' urging.
ReplyDeleteBe sure to salute the troops on Veterans' Day, the same troops who conducted nine won one and will willingly carry out martial law and home-to-home disarmament.
ReplyDeleteThey get really fat government benefits that they don't want to lose because of your "rights."
Those were civilian police officers who conducted martial law in Boston. The military did not participate.
ReplyDeleteHmmm
ReplyDeleteThis is a great example of how to spin a story.........
The story of course is that these 2 brothers are actually GUILTY. The only problem was that our government was organized enough, wasn't vigilant enough, didn't communicate enough to catch them.
So this article and many like it are pushing 2 underlying themes; the brothers did it. And if the DHS was just better (read more powerful) it would have stopped the bombing.
No where in all this are any of the long long list of anomalies, inconsistencies, fabrications and out right lies that clearly point to some one other than the brothers being the perpetrators. Does anyone honestly believe that the government which usually can't figure out which way is up would be so lucky so many times that they had DHS in place before all of these "attacks"
The article is however a great example of psych ops in action. A little bit of skepticism with a dose of misdirection coupled with a quiet reaffirmation of the governments position.